From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Arulappan, Arul Shaji" <arul(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal - Support for National Characters functionality |
Date: | 2013-07-15 03:37:58 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob_Kc44a2vDiL5YLCdnM6+H=1YqAS63zYueddWTPLJXCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, what I know almost all use utf8 without problems. Long time I didn't
> see any request for multi encoding support.
Well, not *everything* can be represented as UTF-8; I think this is
particularly an issue with Asian languages.
If we chose to do it, I think that per-column encoding support would
end up looking a lot like per-column collation support: it would be
yet another per-column property along with typoid, typmod, and
typcollation. I'm not entirely sure it's worth it, although FWIW I do
believe Oracle has something like this. At any rate, it seems like
quite a lot of work.
Another idea would be to do something like what we do for range types
- i.e. allow a user to declare a type that is a differently-encoded
version of some base type. But even that seems pretty hard.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-15 03:49:47 | Re: Proposal: template-ify (binary) extensions |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2013-07-15 03:20:51 | Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division] |