From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches) |
Date: | 2017-03-22 16:20:48 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobYwca6tngMtB3ZG7Hv4Ar+C=g-pGuOCjH09QsTFgL_CA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay, switched as ready for committer. One note for the committer
> though: keeping the calls of pgstat_bestart() out of
> BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection() and
> BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid() keeps users the
> possibility to not have backends connected to the database show up in
> pg_stat_activity. This may matter for some users (cloud deployment for
> example). I am as well in favor in keeping the work of those routines
> minimal, without touching at pgstat.
I think that's just inviting bugs of omission, in both core and
extension code. I think it'd be much better to do this in a
centralized place.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-03-22 16:21:14 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sync pg_dump and pg_dumpall output |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-22 16:17:36 | Re: Logical decoding on standby |