Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Date: 2025-02-22 01:16:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmobXwtS0ncAVfukE-Uhhy8Zt5rQWwQb2WHBcSop8r4Lcgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 7:04 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Sounds plausible. I note that this run:
>
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skimmer&dt=2025-02-21%2023%3A00%3A10
>
> got through a couple of iterations of the core tests before failing,
> showing that it's not 100% reproducible even on the machines where
> it's happening.

Yeah, I pushed an attempt at a band-aid fix. Hopefully that will make
it clear whether there are other problems and how bad they are. It
looks like the XversionUpgrade tests are not this commit's fault.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2025-02-22 01:27:30 Re: TAP test command_fails versus command_fails_like
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-02-22 01:09:24 a very significant fraction of the buildfarm is now pink