Re: pg_shmem_allocations view

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_shmem_allocations view
Date: 2014-07-14 18:13:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmobWg8Thps0wW6OB9ZXcMq3_CE_P_nkeZKDQLaeEdCMHXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> At 2014-05-08 15:28:22 +0200, andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote:
>> > > Hm. Not sure what you're ACKing here ;).
>> >
>> > The idea of giving the unallocated memory a NULL key.
>>
>> Ok. A new version of the patches implementing that are attached.
>> Including a couple of small fixups and docs. The latter aren't
>> extensive, but that doesn't seem to be warranted anyway.
>
> I realise now that this email didn't actually have an attachment. Could
> you please repost the latest version of this patch?

That's odd. I received two attachments with that email. Of course, I
was copied directly, but why would the archives have lost the
attachments?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-07-14 18:17:09 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2014-07-14 18:03:44 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)