Re: libpq SSL with non-blocking sockets

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq SSL with non-blocking sockets
Date: 2011-07-09 03:33:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmobVFzT2O9M9PgYRnQ0tz5SrLNg0Ths0b-tfz69LvWMxiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2011 05:08 AM, Steve Singer wrote:
>> Since the original patch was submitted as a WIP patch and this version
>> wasn't sent until well into the commit fest I am not sure if it
>> qualifies for a committer during this commitfest or if it needs to wait
>> until the next one.
>
> If possible I would like the fix to be backported as well. This is
> quite a nasty bug and difficult to track down. Especially as the
> actual SSL error messages are masked by the "server closed the
> connection unexpectedly" message.

I would not be inclined to back-patch this straight away. I agree
it's an important fix, but I am a little worried about the chances of
breaking something else... then again, I don't have the only vote
here.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Duncan 2011-07-09 04:04:55 Re: [HACKERS] Creating temp tables inside read only transactions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-09 03:30:10 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints