| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend |
| Date: | 2020-08-11 15:02:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobV8_D=wcj_C0fMMEEooX-FNT8i1TPU+3di0bWX0-cE=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:59 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:32:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Do we really want to end up with several separate defines for different
> > type of catalog batch inserts? That doesn't seem like a good
> > thing. Think there should be a single define for all catalog bulk
> > inserts.
>
> Unlikely so, but I kept them separate to potentially lower the
> threshold of 64kB for catalog rows that have a lower average size than
> pg_attribute.
Uh, why would we want to do that?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-11 15:14:55 | Re: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2020-08-11 14:47:30 | Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." |