Re: pg_amcheck contrib application

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date: 2021-03-12 18:10:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmobTsaZxiyqb3On-nYcS+TKXebb2sHMUAoyn-vviT8kevA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:41 AM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> In this next patch, your documentation patch has been applied, and the whole project has been relocated from contrib/pg_amcheck to src/bin/pg_amcheck.

Committed that way with some small adjustments. Let's see what the
buildfarm thinks.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-03-12 18:12:46 Re: Confusing behavior of psql's \e
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-03-12 16:41:44 Re: pg_amcheck contrib application