| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Rogers <teukros(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? |
| Date: | 2015-05-21 14:58:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobRd6aHxJXZjhWbGAJW4HtrnqvbdyzgnnEYVAhqEbLJrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Chris Rogers <teukros(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I need this feature a lot. Can anyone point me to a place in the code where
> I can hack together a quick-and-dirty, compatibility-breaking
> implementation? Thanks!
Does this help?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/38448.1430519406@sss.pgh.pa.us
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-05-21 15:19:27 | Re: GROUPING |
| Previous Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2015-05-21 14:48:20 | Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug? |