| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Date: | 2016-04-13 15:06:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobRceZCub3Qvius7TdWEtsPX2gArPzc3dJ8zXs5Zj2QjA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Well, I'm less likely to write a patch when there's no chance that it's
> going to be applied. Which the rest of the thread sounds like...
I hope somebody writes it at some point, because we surely want to fix
this for 9.7. However, I agree that there seems to be a tangible lack
of enthusiasm for doing anything about it right now. I'm slightly
surprised by that, but that's OK: I just work here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-13 15:08:39 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-13 15:01:37 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-13 15:08:39 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-13 15:01:37 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |