Re: Performance degradation in Bitmapscan (commit 75ae538bc3168bf44475240d4e0487ee2f3bb376)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in Bitmapscan (commit 75ae538bc3168bf44475240d4e0487ee2f3bb376)
Date: 2016-12-16 15:12:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmobRX+8wh6zwt2CYxNG30j+vbBehHL3-VbyR4hJPNP6Abw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've got no problem with that at all, but I want to unbreak things
> more or less immediately and then you/we can further improve it later.

Committed, although I realize now that doesn't fix Dilip's problem,
only my (somewhat different) problem. To fix his issue, we need
something like your 0001. Are you going to polish that up soon here?
I kinda want to get the regressions we've introduced fixed here.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-12-16 15:17:00 Re: background sessions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-16 15:00:54 Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraint violation [and 2 more messages] [and 1 more messages]