Re: autonomous transactions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions
Date: 2016-10-09 22:11:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmobQk8F1SxHn2hXBD7sDma2F3eLQSBoKvrDJd5QPUURnnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> For myself, I don't care what you call it.
>
> I just want to be able to invoke it by saying PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
> and I know many others do also.

To me, those statements are rather contradictory, and I don't support
the latter proposal. However, I don't have the only vote here,
either.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-10-09 22:12:31 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup in macOS build.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-09 22:10:33 Re: Relids in upper relations