From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Date: | 2019-03-18 19:19:51 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobP7VeUFC92Bi1O5E__iQtDSSrjvNrWHNNHyoYwLmWZZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached the updated patch you proposed and the patch that converts
> the grammer productions for the VACUUM option on top of the former
> patch. The latter patch moves VacuumOption to vacuum.h since the
> parser no longer needs such information.
Committed.
> If we take this direction I will change the parallel vacuum patch so
> that it adds new PARALLEL option and adds 'nworkers' to VacuumParams.
Sounds good.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-18 19:35:39 | Re: BUG #15641: Autoprewarm worker fails to start on Windows with huge pages in use Old PostgreSQL community/pgsql-bugs x |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-03-18 19:08:49 | Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications |