| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea |
| Date: | 2022-02-14 17:47:44 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobNofXrdsgujZNedyhO5=GNk_t6zfB4PMDUWnbS5e=FaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 6:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Huh, doesn't Test::More already provide a sane way to do this?
> If not, why isn't die() good enough? (I don't think you can
> realistically expect to prohibit die() anywhere in the TAP tests.)
+1 for die. There's very little reason to use BAIL_OUT. If we agree
that we need a wrapper for die() for some reason, I can live with
that, too, but die is simple and familiar to perl programmers.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-14 17:51:04 | Re: fixing bookindex.html bloat |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-14 17:46:20 | Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea |