| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery. |
| Date: | 2013-02-07 11:48:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobN6KMhO6waAMVwWhmhr00GP0DWTBNsNs70h8EwFG=-LA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> It makes me uncomfortable that we're adding switches to pg_ctl promote just
> because we're worried there might be bugs in our code. If we don't trust the
> code as it is, it needs more testing. We can analyze the code more
> thoroughly, to make an educated guess on what's likely to happen if it's
> broken, and consider adding some sanity checks etc. to make the consequences
> less severe. We should not put the burden on our users to decide if the code
> is trustworthy enough to use.
+1
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-07 15:18:40 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery. |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-02-07 09:47:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-07 11:49:32 | Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-02-07 11:42:59 | Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters |