From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: empty backup_label |
Date: | 2012-06-26 16:05:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobLWpfVisoFdUx0__6LFjdMu96KipnAT0RnBdLHmpow1g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> We're using NetApp's flexclone's whenever we need to move our DB between machines.
>>>
>>> One specific case where we do that is when we're creating a new streaming replication target.
>>>
>>> The basic steps we're using are:
>>> pg_start_backup();
>>> <flex clone within the netapp>
>>> pg_stop_backup();
>>>
>>> The problem i'm seeing is that periodically the backup_label is empty, which means
>>> I can't start the new standby.
>>>
>>> I believe that since the NetApp stuff is all happening within the SAN this file hasn't been
>>> fsynced to disk by the time we take the snapshot.
>>>
>>> One option would be to do a "sync" prior to the clone, however that seems kind of like a
>>> heavy operation, and it's slightly more complicated to script. (having to have a user
>>> account on the system to sudo rather than just connecting to the db to issue the
>>> pg_start_backup(...) )
>>>
>>> Another option is to add pg_fsync(fileno(fp)) after the fflush() when creating the file (I'm not
>>> sure if fsync implies fflush or not, if it does you could just replace it.)
>>>
>>> I think this type of snapshot is fairly common, I've been doing them since 2000 with EMC,
>>> i'm sure that most SAN vendors support it.
>>
>> These seems like a good idea to me. Actually, I'm wondering if we
>> shouldn't back-patch this.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Certainly can't hurt.
>
> I guess any other files that are lost this way will be recreated by
> WAL recovery - or is there something else tha tmight be of risk of
> similar treatment?
I can't think of anything. pg_start_backup does a checkpoint, which
in theory oughta be enough to make sure everything that matters hits
the platter.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-26 16:11:21 | Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers |
Previous Message | David Kerr | 2012-06-26 16:04:32 | Re: empty backup_label |