| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Command Triggers |
| Date: | 2011-12-14 21:22:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobKRKRLv3Kb758wH1WrQ93g6cOorYhV-i_xCVCtnFwdKg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié dic 14 07:22:21 -0300 2011:
>> Again, that's a caveat of the first implementation, you can't have sub
>> commands support without forcing them through ProcessUtility and that's
>> a much more invasive patch. Maybe we will need that later.
>
> I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility
> for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature.
That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail
that we might want to change at some point.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-12-14 21:28:48 | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-12-14 21:16:56 | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |