Re: pgindent fixups

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent fixups
Date: 2016-05-03 15:31:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmobJHoAtip15OCMAagUKvd11pY1djL31nkgWDLGR3E0TMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> OK, I committed this. Barring objections, I'll go ahead and pgindent
>> the whole tree tomorrow. If we're going to revert anything big then
>> we might want to hold off, but otherwise I think its better to get
>> this done sooner rather than later.
>
> Well, there are at least two patchsets we're actively discussing
> reverting, so I think this should wait till those decisions are resolved.

OK, but that may well mean we don't get this done before beta1, which
I think is a bummer, but oh well.

There are a lot more than 2 patchsets that are busted at the moment,
unfortunately, but I assume you are referring to "snapshot too old"
and "Use Foreign Key relationships to infer multi-column join
selectivity".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-03 15:36:39 Re: pgindent fixups
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-03 15:23:23 Re: pgindent fixups