| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD |
| Date: | 2017-12-13 21:21:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobHkLty7LL4ADkxf_9xxvqwKtWkbqH+BQ6N9yMCn=4N8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've also verified the backward scan case with the query provided by
> Thomas. In standby,
> 2. explain analyze select * from t1 where a+1>a order by a desc; and
> the parallel workers hang.
> The patch fixes the issue.
Committed and back-patched to v10.
Sorry, Kuntal, I forgot to credit you in the commit message. :-(
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-13 21:35:04 | Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-13 21:02:01 | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com |