| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats |
| Date: | 2022-11-28 17:58:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobHNXBq5Z0T3P_FbQ6MncqwKr19L9-Z90WEb879d4-oMA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:53 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I think we should consider deprecating the pg_stat_bgwriter columns but
> leaving them in place for a few years. New stuff should only be added to
> pg_stat_checkpointer, but we don't need to break old monitoring queries.
I vote to just remove them. I think that most people won't update
their queries until they are forced to do so. I don't think it
matters very much when we force them to do that.
Our track record in following through on deprecations is pretty bad
too, which is another consideration.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-11-28 18:25:06 | Re: Decouple last important WAL record LSN from WAL insert locks |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-11-28 17:38:16 | Re: Bug in wait time when waiting on nested subtransaction |