| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Future In-Core Replication |
| Date: | 2012-04-26 23:40:40 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobHGPxNHp13mzZZoeJqP-GVN4FMFGG2F2ttw5EyUAtYkw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> So the idea is that you'll present briefly your intentions for 9.3 at
> the developer meeting, and then have this in-depth afterwards? Sounds
> great.
I really, really do not want the developer meeting to turn into a
series of presentations. That's what we had last year, and it was
boring and unproductive. Furthermore, it excludes from the
conversation everyone who doesn't fit into a room in Ottawa. I think
that plans should be presented here, on pgsql-hackers, and the
developer meeting should be reserved for discussion of issues with
which everyone who will be there is already familiar. If a
presentation is required, the developer meeting is the wrong forum,
IMHO of course.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-27 00:03:44 | Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-04-26 22:48:01 | Re: Future In-Core Replication |