Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION"
Date: 2024-05-21 17:36:27
Message-ID: CA+TgmobGvRSELZP=E-XvzsRvkyFAG4LFDaVz0sEdP1H99WXUjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:44 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for having a look. I was planning to have the commit message
> as per attached. I'd only split the patch for ease of review per
> request of Tom. I should have mentioned that here.
>
> I would adjust the exact wording in the final paragraph as required
> depending on what plan materialises.
>
> This also fixes up the comment stuff that Heikki mentioned.

The consensus on pgsql-release was to unrevert this patch and commit
the fix now, rather than waiting for the next beta. However, the
consensus was also to push the un-revert as a separate commit from the
bug fix, rather than together as suggested by Álvaro. Since time is
short due to the impending release and it's very late where you are,
I've taken care of this. Hope that's OK.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-05-21 17:50:58 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2024-05-21 17:06:43 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes