From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: copyParamList |
Date: | 2016-05-31 16:40:03 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobEPjfRCP0=wG-SEZ8mebgB-=-pkFyNtrYgcD31Tx=+VQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> copyParamList does not respect from->paramMask, in what looks to me like
> an obvious oversight:
>
> retval->paramMask = NULL;
> [...]
> /* Ignore parameters we don't need, to save cycles and space. */
> if (retval->paramMask != NULL &&
> !bms_is_member(i, retval->paramMask))
>
> retval->paramMask is never set to anything not NULL in this function,
> so surely that should either be initializing it to from->paramMask, or
> checking from->paramMask in the conditional?
Oh, dear. I think you are right. I'm kind of surprised this didn't
provoke a test failure somewhere.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-31 16:41:08 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-05-31 16:38:53 | Re: what to revert |