From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Use of systable_beginscan_ordered in event trigger patch |
Date: | 2012-12-13 23:18:45 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobDXZKgOi+Xj71i63mSsLYuqOR=6nZ+GqtMTqSbxYSuzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>> Maybe we could just append to it how to remove such an event trigger,
>>> which is easy to do because you can't target an event trigger related
>>> command with event triggers, so the following is not disabled:
>>> DROP EVENT TRIGGER abort_ddl;
>>
>> Oh really? The explanation of the example certainly doesn't say that.
>
> I remember than in my proposals somewhere we had support for a very
> limited form of command triggers for any command in the system. Of
> course as that included transaction control commands we made that
> better. I'm quite tired so maybe my memory is playing tricks to me, but
> I kind of remember that we also had quite a discussion about just that
> example and its phrasing in the docs and did came out with something
> satisfactory.
>
> Robert, does that ring a bell to you? I'm going to crawl the archives
> tomorrow if not…
Yeah, I'm pretty sure you can't set event triggers of any kind on
event triggers. You proposed to allow some stuff that would affect
"every command", but I yelled and screamed about that until we got rid
of it, 'cuz it just seemed way too dangerous.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-13 23:25:13 | Re: Use of systable_beginscan_ordered in event trigger patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-12-13 23:16:08 | Re: Logical decoding & exported base snapshot |