Re: Releasing in September

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Releasing in September
Date: 2016-01-22 15:00:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmobDOtH8y1+QSsuQheBOD5qh=38Kti5VNUDSFDwKCOATLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Perhaps some people are more interested in implementing new
>> features than working on bugs and would just continue hacking and
>> arguing about new features, at least a stability period may attract
>> more committer attention into actual bug fixes, in short: no new
>> features can be committed until the previous versions has reached at
>> least beta2, rc, whatever. This may accelerate the stability process.
>
> Or it might just accelerate the amount of time it takes to *declare*
> having reached that milestone.

Yes. I think that's been a problem already, and closing development
for prolonged periods of time will make it worse.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-22 15:03:41 Re: Releasing in September
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-01-22 14:55:12 Re: Combining Aggregates