Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Date: 2024-11-13 19:52:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmobBJz1rV3_HOSEsQgf2ss+DUGKbwaqEpV3ccAEKETOzDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:05 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> So, my question now is, would there be much opposition to backpatching
> beb4e9ba1652 + 1fb17b190341 to REL_14_STABLE?

It seems like it's been long enough now that if the new logic had
major problems we probably would have found them by now; so I feel
like it's probably pretty safe. Perhaps it's questionable how many
people we'll help by back-patching this into one additional release,
but if you feel it's worth it I wouldn't be inclined to argue.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-11-13 20:00:30 Re: Fix for pageinspect bug in PG 17
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-11-13 19:51:45 Re: Graceful way to handle too many locks