Re: Duplicate prototype for socket_set_nonblocking.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Duplicate prototype for socket_set_nonblocking.
Date: 2016-08-23 17:46:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmobBH1jPv9DHvD7FSSMFZ1tPje_60T4f=RxmjAPBaPUxsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Looking into pqcomm.c, I noticed that the prototype of
> socket_set_nonblocking defined twice. Actually the prototype is
> not necessary at all but one may remain as a convention.
>
> It doesn't no harm so backpatching seems unnecessary.

Thanks, committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-08-23 17:47:15 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-08-23 17:45:44 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()