Re: what's going on with lapwing?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgbuildfarm(at)rjuju(dot)net
Subject: Re: what's going on with lapwing?
Date: 2025-03-06 17:45:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmobASML_jbWXkKPpcQWahVzO2VfyVEb_TFoOjskHgY_sfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 12:22 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I don't think that's the way to think about old buildfarm members.
> Sure, nobody is very likely to be putting PG 18 on a Debian 7 box,
> but the odds are much higher that they might have PG 13 on it and
> wish to update to 13.latest. So what you need to compare OS EOL
> dates to is not current development but our oldest supported branch.

But the work it's creating is mostly because it's still testing
master. If it were only testing a gradually-decreasing set of older
branches, that wouldn't seem weird to me.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-03-06 17:59:34 Re: Statistics Import and Export
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2025-03-06 17:39:03 Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements