Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time
Date: 2015-06-19 15:16:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmobAKpCEsGN_oYa4xkdkXv5UcC=oW_oA1BEpse0X4c2Bjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wonder whether it's such a good idea for the postmaster to give
> up waiting before all children are gone (postmaster.c:1722 in HEAD).

I doubt it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-06-19 15:17:53 Re: pg_receivexlog --create-slot-if-not-exists
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-19 15:14:32 Re: Missing tab-complete for PASSWORD word in CREATE ROLE syntax