Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again
Date: 2024-12-11 21:45:41
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob9C6Pu1Nhv6SWHRB_5MbsOo7KaGcNddouf4e7+gr5vHQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Anyway, if you feel like rewriting that stuff, step right up.
> My feeling about it is that the law of conservation of cruft
> will prevent a replacement from being all that much cleaner,
> but maybe I'm wrong.

Thanks for the thoughts. It's always good to get your perspective on
stuff like this, or at least I find it so.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-12-11 22:36:46 Re: connection establishment versus parallel workers
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-12-11 21:29:51 Re: VACUUM cleaning of CF 2024-11