Re: improve predefined roles documentation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: improve predefined roles documentation
Date: 2024-06-26 14:40:10
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob8BMaobK5M-XHWqBhqYEjZ4dLrBquGcYJ+83+kGeK=OQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:19 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, my options were to either separate the roles or to weaken the
> ordering, and I guess I felt like the weaker ordering was slightly less
> bad. The extra context in some of the groups seemed worth keeping, and
> this probably isn't the only page of our docs that might require ctrl+f.
> But I'll yield to the majority opinion here.

I'm not objecting. I'm just asking.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-06-26 14:46:26 Re: pgsql: Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-06-26 14:38:08 Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?