Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Date: 2016-05-13 14:57:48
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob88Z=Tq0-2A57-jCtDpE4BJ2sG---vfxAQL8d8vRjhOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I am not arguing with you but... good luck. History has shown that the
> argument above is basically this:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sisyphus

Hey, parallel query only took three release cycles. :-p

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2016-05-13 16:48:39 Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-05-13 14:55:09 Re: When should be advocate external projects?