Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Date: 2015-08-07 15:40:50
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5qE=yy1tQtvbjKkOnb_BaKNY0xtn=Q92oydnf+wrnMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> Just thought I would post it in this thread, because this change does help
> on the performance numbers compared to 9.5 :)

So are you saying that the performance was already worse before this
patch landed, and then this patch made it somewhat better? Or are you
saying you think this patch broke it?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-08-07 15:41:18 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-07 15:26:08 Re: Autonomous Transaction is back