Re: LWLocks in DSM memory

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Date: 2016-08-15 22:15:23
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5nLDO7mU+wJWt_c=-sLmoDpjjXR-UNhB61nZXh0pijQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Therefore, I plan to commit this patch, removing the #include
> <stddef.h> unless someone convinces me we need it, shortly after
> development for v10 opens, unless there are objections before then.

Hearing no objections, done.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-15 22:28:53 Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta
Previous Message Ildar Musin 2016-08-15 22:03:59 Index Onlys Scan for expressions