Re: Add Postgres module info

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)omnigres(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add Postgres module info
Date: 2025-03-24 14:31:27
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5maQdhTDAnQmy2=UjfeJYwQg8dexY5F+kgfWCKe54rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 3:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think this version is ready to commit, if there are not objections
> to the decisions mentioned above.

It looks reasonable to me. I am a bit worried that using PG_VERSION as
the version string is going to feel like the wrong thing at some
stage, but I can't really say why, and I think it's better to do
something now and maybe have to revise it later than to do nothing now
and hope that we come up with a brilliant idea at some point in the
future.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-03-24 14:43:38 Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-03-24 14:22:17 Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints