Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date: 2016-10-17 20:53:39
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5JAKXRfmW63FWdxn43Khe7n+1UD1dXsHnntEcW1Q--Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> Re: Stephen Frost 2016-10-12 <20161012190732(dot)GJ13284(at)tamriel(dot)snowman(dot)net>
>> For my 2c, I'd rather have %m, but I definitely agree with Robert that
>> we need to do *something* here and if the only thing holding us back is
>> %t vs. %m, then let's just pick one and move on. I'll just hold my nose
>> when I see the default and change it to %m.
>
> Here's the very same patch with %m instead of %t. Pick one :)
>
> (Fwiw, I'm still leaning towards %t, but my eyes are becoming more and
> more accustomed to %m as well. I'd be fine with it as well. (I'd
> rather want to try to get rid of the timezone identifier there...))

So, surveying this thread, what I see is:

People who prefer %m: Jeff Janes, Devrim Gündüz, Stephen Frost
People who prefer %t: Christoph Berg, Tom Lane (I think)

We can kibitz this more later, but for now I've committed it with %m.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-10-17 21:00:35 Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-10-17 20:50:46 Re: bit|varbit #, xor operator