Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Date: 2015-01-20 15:54:25
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5Gu=_YENE_Ae9tA0_j-gfLUMs+312XDXpzSKEW37HZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that the attached patch should at least fix that much. Maybe
> the problem on the other animal is also explained by the lack of this,
> since there could also be a MinGW-ish strxfrm_l(), I suppose.

Committed that, rather blindly, since it looks like a reasonable fix.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-01-20 16:08:16 Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-01-20 15:40:30 Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg