From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Date: | 2015-06-26 16:36:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob4=3wKbw2Qvx6YvT87w6XCSoGEWqDSkTcAz+OVXZ6-BQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2015-06-11 PM 01:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
>> the output here:
>>
>> http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
>>
>> and it will eventually appear here:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release.html
>>
>> I am ready to make suggested adjustments, though I am traveling for
>> conferences for the next ten days so there might a delay in my replies.
>>
>
> Is it intentional that the following items are separate?
>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> Move <application>pg_upgrade</> from <filename>contrib</> to
> <filename>src/bin</> (Peter Eisentraut)
> </para>
> </listitem>
>
>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> Move <application>pg_upgrade_support</> code into backend and
> remove the module (Peter Eisentraut)
> </para>
> </listitem>
>
> Or could they made into one item?
I think one item would be fine.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-26 16:42:22 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-06-26 16:30:00 | Re: GIN: Implementing triConsistent and strategy number |