| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3 |
| Date: | 2014-01-29 04:09:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob3zbW_jWg1QNCMviL6vN=oNjKP0qFk3nzs6z3SUNv3GA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> I think "physical" and "logical" are fine and they seem to be well known
> terminology. Oracle uses those words and I have also seen many places use
> "physical backup" and "logical backup", for example on Barman's homepage.
There's certainly something to be said for this.
Another idea I had this evening was "logical replication" and
"WAL-based replication", but that's a bit confusing too since logical
rep. is going to use WAL as an underlying technology.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-01-29 04:13:53 | Re: updated emacs configuration |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-01-29 04:03:26 | Re: updated emacs configuration |