| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Append implementation |
| Date: | 2017-04-04 14:22:53 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob3iQFVikFhd5k8EcsCDgmZuMTFgkSXONx0jeYvhW4dbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'm afraid this is too late for v10 - do you agree?
Yeah, I think so. The benefit of this will be a lot more once we get
partitionwise join and partitionwise aggregate working, but that
probably won't happen for this release, or at best in limited cases.
And while we might not agree on exactly what work this patch still
needs, I think it does still need some work. I've moved this to the
next CommitFest.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-04 14:28:39 | Re: background sessions |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2017-04-04 14:22:44 | Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument |