Re: GUC for temporarily disabling event triggers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Mikhail Gribkov <youzhick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC for temporarily disabling event triggers
Date: 2023-09-06 14:22:24
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob38GJCyUe1eDrR_ygyrgJivgwzJpgzrAZ5AtPM2t3cig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:50 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 5 Sep 2023, at 17:29, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:12 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> >> The attached version of the patch replaces it with a boolean flag for turning
> >> off all event triggers, and I also renamed it to the debug_xxx "GUC namespace"
> >> which seemed more appropriate.
> >
> > I don't care for the debug_xxx renaming, myself. I think that should
> > be reserved for things where we believe there's no reason to ever use
> > it in production/real life, or for things whose purpose is to emit
> > debugging messages. Neither is the case here.
>
> Fair enough, how about disable_event_trigger instead as per the attached?

I usually prefer to give things a positive sense, talking about
whether things are enabled rather than disabled. I'd do event_triggers
= off | on, like we have for row_security. YMMV, though.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-09-06 14:35:17 Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-09-06 14:20:06 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning