| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New CF app deployment |
| Date: | 2015-01-26 20:46:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob2svgie_EVSsjrZ=ERzqH-+JuTu0n90rk2O-VZz1_HpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Yes, and the agreement after that feedback was to try it out and then figure
> out what changes were needed? As about half the feedback said it was better
> without and half said it was better with.
Well, I can't speak to anyone else's opinion, but I'm quite sure I
raised the issue that we need a way to call out which messages in the
thread are important, and I think that's pretty much what Peter is
saying, too. I find the new tool essentially unusable - having one
link to the whole thread instead of individual links to just the
important messages in that thread is a huge regression for me, as is
the lack of the most recent activity on the summary page. I don't
know how much more feedback than that you need to be convinced, but
I'm going to shut up now before I say something I will later regret.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-26 20:46:56 | Re: Partitioning: issues/ideas (Was: Re: On partitioning) |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-26 20:44:20 | Re: proposal: row_to_array function |