Re: Auto-vacuum is not running in 9.1.12

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prakash Itnal <prakash074(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, rasna(dot)t(at)nokia(dot)com, sandhya(dot)k_s(at)nokia(dot)com
Subject: Re: Auto-vacuum is not running in 9.1.12
Date: 2015-06-18 15:14:24
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob1sA98A1ZVROcJvRTkVqRTW3E1qNmwo64_jPfUbs0mmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, the case is pretty weird and I'm not really sure that the server
> ought to be expected to behave. But if this is actually the only part
> of the server that misbehaves because of sudden gigantic time jumps, I
> think it's fair to patch it. Here's a proposed patch.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2015-06-18 17:47:20 Re: [PATCH] Function to get size of asynchronous notification queue
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-18 15:12:26 Re: s_lock() seems too aggressive for machines with many sockets