| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing "Included attributes in B-tree indexes" section from docs |
| Date: | 2018-06-18 17:43:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob1bhKBYipODnneP-fcDXVRJ4C1oTbZgeSVwQGRm8WBGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I think there's also a question of how much a patch is blocking you /
> others. A shorter question period is more understandable if it's step
> 3/40, rather than 1/1...
Agreed. For non-critical stuff like this it seems like waiting 2 or 3
business days is a good idea.
Doesn't sound like there's any actual controversy in this case, though.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-06-18 18:04:19 | Re: Fix slot's xmin advancement and subxact's lost snapshots in decoding. |
| Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2018-06-18 17:41:42 | Re: Query Rewrite for Materialized Views (Postgres Extension) |