| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
| Date: | 2024-10-04 14:24:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob1CC=pdWYZ+MOz-kYCqfDZsXc_moAjyAemPrZyu55M-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:20 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> The existing IN() syntax somehow manages to produce a useful bigint[]
> SAOP when I use the same mix of integer types/constants that were used
> for my original test case from yesterday:
Interesting. I would not have guessed that. I wonder how it works.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-10-04 14:47:56 | Re: Should rolpassword be toastable? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-10-04 14:20:20 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |