| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
| Date: | 2022-06-07 14:26:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob12ZKj-S6mnFbBMS7DPuiSHV8H0bd7UP=pXT+BYj8a3Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think a reasonable case can be made for excluding "internal" GUCs
> on the grounds that (a) they cannot be set, and therefore (b) whatever
> value they have might as well be considered the default.
I agree.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh ravichandran | 2022-06-07 14:41:11 | Re: pg_rewind: warn when checkpoint hasn't happened after promotion |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-06-07 14:25:05 | Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option |