Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Date: 2022-07-22 12:07:46
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob0BBeK6GEMUQBPiv0kJpTJSEgX+OUD2FeY42zWVgJuLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 6:47 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I feel the discussion has slightly deviated which makes it unclear
> whether this patch is required or not?

My opinion is that showing some fractional digits at least when
loops>1 would be better than what we have now. It might not be the
best thing we could do, but it would be better than doing nothing.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 王伟 (学弈) 2022-07-22 12:17:51 回复:Re: PANIC: wrong buffer passed to visibilitymap_clear
Previous Message Juan José Santamaría Flecha 2022-07-22 11:58:54 Re: Windows default locale vs initdb