| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robins <robins(at)pobox(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Eliminating PD_ALL_VISIBLE, take 2 |
| Date: | 2013-07-02 00:59:24 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob-zYrqBOPDy1+_SSwu9=h_eUdanPHH1vomCYCfus7W9g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> Can you point me to that criticism? Why can't you just drop the VM
> completely if it becomes corrupted?
>
> (You might be referring to another idea of mine that was related to
> Andres's proposal for "getting rid of freezing".)
One of several relevant emails is at:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51A7473C.6070208@vmware.com
It is definitely possible that I am mixing up two different things.
But if I am, I don't know what the other one is.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-07-02 02:39:46 | Re: Eliminating PD_ALL_VISIBLE, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-07-02 00:32:30 | Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER |