Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Rogers <teukros(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?
Date: 2015-04-30 11:35:50
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob-=Gw8MPpH=x58yhU7+qc2ZQ5W0+324Kjw4c4JxhgF2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Chris Rogers <teukros(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Has there been any movement on this in the last couple years?
>
> I could really use the ability to optimize across CTE boundaries, and it
> seems like a lot of other people could too.

I'm not aware that anyone is working on it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-04-30 11:37:07 Re: [RFC] sepgsql: prohibit users to relabel objects
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-04-30 11:33:23 Re: Reducing tuple overhead