From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing faulty hyperLogLog merge function |
Date: | 2016-04-27 00:32:56 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob=sHoruxibqFT0mdGYVcnz3qZvCgS4b7kTAZmBpUit_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> You don't want to remove buggy code that is currently unused simply
>>> because it might be useful to have that functionality in the future?
>>
>> No, I don't want to remove code that somebody thinks we should fix
>> instead of removing on your say-so.
>
> I don't think that that's an efficient use of anyone's time. If
> somebody proposes a patch with functionality that needs to merge HLL
> states, then they can add an implementation at that time.
Peter, if there is consensus on this patch, I will commit it. If
there isn't, I won't. If you don't like that, sorry.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-27 00:37:28 | Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-04-26 23:54:05 | Re: Removing faulty hyperLogLog merge function |