Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-07 16:38:16
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob==oNYLN2M-pVVaLNMZxqvXk3_EoUnJqqRdd-8tm0CNw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> begin;
>> create schema if not exists s;
>> create table s.t (c text, d text, id serial) partition by list
>> ((ascii(substring(coalesce(c, d, ''), 1, 1))));
>> create table s.t_part_ascii_065 partition of s.t for values in ( 65 );
>>
>> it logs as follows:
>>
>> 2016-12-07 17:03:45.787 CET 6125 LOG: server process (PID 11503) was
>> terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
>> 2016-12-07 17:03:45.787 CET 6125 DETAIL: Failed process was running: create
>> table s.t_part_ascii_065 partition of s.t for values in ( 65 );
>
> Hm, will look into this in a few hours.

My bad. The fix I sent last night for one of the cache flush issues
wasn't quite right. The attached seems to fix it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
partkey-flush-fix.patch text/x-patch 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2016-12-07 16:53:28 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Amit Langote 2016-12-07 16:34:44 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take